Grant Thornton uses cookies to monitor the performance of this website and improve user experience

To find out more about cookies, what they are and how we use them, please see our privacy notice, which also provides information on how to delete cookies from your hard drive.

Global site
  • Global site
  • Africa
  • Americas
  • Asia Pacific
  • Europe
  • Middle East
Grant Thorton Logo
Grant Thornton Logo Grant Thornton logo
  • Skip to content
  • Skip to navigation
EN JA 中文
Close Global search
  • Services
  • Insights
  • About Us
  • Office Map
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Audit & Assurance Services
  • Tax Services
  • Advisory
Tax Services Home
  • Business Tax Services
  • Private Client Consulting
  • International Tax Services
  • Transaction Tax
Advisory Home
  • Corporate Finance
  • IPO Consulting
  • International financial reporting standards (IFRS)
  • Reorganizations
  • Corporate governance and risk management
  • Forensic and investigation services
  • Market research
  • Strategy
  • China Business and Tax Advisory Services
  • Human Capital
  • Business Process Re-engineering
  • Forensic and investigation services
    • EN
    • JA
    • 中文
    1. Home
    2. Insights
    3. Global mobility services
    4. Losses on rental property disallowed for Japanese taxes

    Losses on rental property disallowed for Japanese taxes

    2020/01/07

    Losses on rental property disallowed for Japanese taxes

    On 12 December 2019, the Japanese government announced tax changes for 2020 including provisions that will affect internationally mobile employees who have rental properties outside Japan. The changes limit the ability of taxpayers to offset losses from buildings that are not newly built.

    Under Japanese depreciation rules, the ‘useful life’ of a building may have already lapsed if it was built a number of years ago. For example, the useful life of a residential apartment with steel and concrete construction is 47 years under existing Japanese tax regulations. For example, if the building was built in 1950, its useful life lapsed in 1997.

    A taxpayer purchasing this apartment (treated as 'second-hand real estate' for Japanese tax purposes) in 2020 would still be able to depreciate this apartment over nine years. Where property is rented to generate income, this often results in a net loss due to the large amount of depreciation expense taxpayers can deduct. For many years, this has been used as a tax saving mechanism as the net loss generating from real estate rental income can be offset against income from other sources including employment income.

    Key changes

    Effective 1 January 2021, taxpayers in Japan will not be allowed to offset losses generating from the rental of overseas 'second-hand' real estate against other income.

    If an individual has a loss from the rental of second-hand overseas real estate using method one, two or three below to calculate depreciation expense, the portion of the loss corresponding to the depreciation expense will be disallowed and cannot be offset against income from other sources.

    This change will effectively close the tax saving opportunity that remained available to international assignees and foreign nationals in Japan leasing their apartment or house in their home country or other countries during assignment or residency in Japan.

    1. For assets that have lapsed all of their statutory useful lives, a method in which the useful life is equal to 20% of their statutory useful lives
    2. For assets that have lapsed a portion of their statutory useful lives, a method in which the useful life is calculated as a sum of (i) the statutory useful life of the asset less elapsed years and (ii) 20% of the elapsed years
    3. A method in which years of useful period after the property has been placed in service is used as the useful life. An exception is allowed for method 3.

      Under method 3, if the taxpayer attaches documents to evidence that the useful life of the overseas second-hand real property in accordance with laws and regulations of the jurisdiction where the overseas second-hand real property is located is used or otherwise evidences that the years of useful period is appropriate, depreciation expense will be allowed.

     

    If a taxpayer subject to the limitation of depreciation expense on overseas second-hand real property later sells that real property, the limited depreciation expense shall not be deducted in calculating the cost basis of that real property for purposes of calculating capital gain. It will generally result in reducing the capital gain.

    Please note that detailed application may change depending on further legislations.

    Get in touch

    If you would like to discuss the full implications of these changes, please contact Tosh Kamii, Grant Thornton Japan

       

    Global talent mobility hub

    In a globalised world, international talent mobility is a key element of a successful global business, it comes with challenges and risks, as well as opportunities.

    Share

    • Facebook LinkedIn
    • Twitter Twitter
    • LinkedIn LinkedIn
    • Line
    • Email Email
    • Grant Thornton on Youtube
    • LinkedIn icon
    • Twitter icon
    Connect
    • Contact
    • Office Map
    About
    • About Us
    • Press releases
    Legal
    • Privacy policy
    • Disclaimer

    © 2023 Grant Thornton Japan - All rights reserved. "Grant Thornton” refers to the brand under which the Grant Thornton member firms provide assurance, tax and advisory services to their clients and/or refers to one or more member firms, as the context requires. GTIL and the member firms are not a worldwide partnership. GTIL and each member firm is a separate legal entity. Services are delivered by the member firms. GTIL does not provide services to clients. GTIL and its member firms are not agents of, and do not obligate, one another and are not liable for one another’s acts or omissions.